It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 4:58 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Please visit our local business partners   Site Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Accurate Laser Engraving All the Right Moves Dance Anytime Fitness Applicable Life Coaching by Dr. Mike Aspen Peak Cellars Winery Brooks Place Tavern Cabin Creek Barbecue Colorado Taekwondo Institute (CTI) Holistic Horse Training Green Mountain Guns Firewise Pro Inglenook Energy Center Knit Knook: A Great Source of Fiber Look What I Found Boutique Luna's Mandala Montessori School of Conifer Neptune Chimney Service Paragon Martial Arts Peak Academy of Dance Pet Tips Bound Relax Salon Taspen's Organics & Holistic Wellness Center

For partnership opportunities email-partners@285bound.com

 




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:02 pm
Posts: 398
archer wrote:
Yeah, I have a source for that, let me know if you need more

Quote:
Lechleiter refers to a study published last year by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation that ranked the U.S. sixth among the top 40 industrialized nations in innovative competitiveness, but dead last in "the rate of change in innovation capacity" over the past decade. The study looked at what countries are doing to become more competitive in the future through higher education, investment in research and development, corporate tax rates, and more.
Lechleiter believes we are at serious risk of falling behind the rest of the world if we fail to take actions to support innovation in industry.

http://www.newjerseybusinesslawattorney ... tion.shtml

Quote:
On Global Public Square last month, Fareed Zakaria made the case that the U.S. economy is struggling in part due to poor investment in science. He based this conclusion on two claims: First, that federal research and development (R&D) investment has declined over the past several years and, second, that American students have fallen behind in science education.

http://www.realclearworld.com/2012/07/2 ... 38477.html

Quote:
A Brookings Fellow told the Congressional Joint Economic Committee that the U.S. is at a technological disadvantage to other industrialized nations due to a declining focus on government-funded research and development (R&D). Michael Greenstone explained in the July 27 hearing the historical importance of R&D funding:

“R&D is one category of spending that develops and drives these new technologies. However, private sector firms are prone to focus their R&D on “applied” projects, where the payoff to their bottom line is likely to accrue only to them… In contrast, government can sponsor the kind of “basic” research projects that seek wide-ranging scientific understanding that can affect entire industries, rather than individual firms.”

http://campusprogress.org/articles/amer ... novation1/


None of this suggests any association between any 'conservative movement' and the state of education.
If anything, this is another indictment on the liberal dominated education system in this country.

This is another failure that falls squarely on the shoulders of the current administration, and the fact that our 'jobs czar' is involved raises questions in itself.

More big government, more waste.

_________________
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
- Club of Rome


http://www.usdebtclock.org/


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 10:27 am
Posts: 8648
LOL wrote:
The company's stock has been trading publicly for years archer. Just open up a brokerage account and buy some. I looked at it years ago myself. They are not doing fine, they have always lost money every quarter, and are running out of cash fast. Anyone here is free to buy shares.


My statement was in response to your saying they were burning cash faster than Chevy Volts caught on fire......maybe you should be more careful with your analogies. :thumbsup:

_________________
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 10:27 am
Posts: 8648
OmniScience wrote:
archer wrote:
Yeah, I have a source for that, let me know if you need more

Quote:
Lechleiter refers to a study published last year by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation that ranked the U.S. sixth among the top 40 industrialized nations in innovative competitiveness, but dead last in "the rate of change in innovation capacity" over the past decade. The study looked at what countries are doing to become more competitive in the future through higher education, investment in research and development, corporate tax rates, and more.
Lechleiter believes we are at serious risk of falling behind the rest of the world if we fail to take actions to support innovation in industry.

http://www.newjerseybusinesslawattorney ... tion.shtml

Quote:
On Global Public Square last month, Fareed Zakaria made the case that the U.S. economy is struggling in part due to poor investment in science. He based this conclusion on two claims: First, that federal research and development (R&D) investment has declined over the past several years and, second, that American students have fallen behind in science education.

http://www.realclearworld.com/2012/07/2 ... 38477.html

Quote:
A Brookings Fellow told the Congressional Joint Economic Committee that the U.S. is at a technological disadvantage to other industrialized nations due to a declining focus on government-funded research and development (R&D). Michael Greenstone explained in the July 27 hearing the historical importance of R&D funding:

“R&D is one category of spending that develops and drives these new technologies. However, private sector firms are prone to focus their R&D on “applied” projects, where the payoff to their bottom line is likely to accrue only to them… In contrast, government can sponsor the kind of “basic” research projects that seek wide-ranging scientific understanding that can affect entire industries, rather than individual firms.”

http://campusprogress.org/articles/amer ... novation1/


None of this suggests any association between any 'conservative movement' and the state of education.
If anything, this is another indictment on the liberal dominated education system in this country.

This is another failure that falls squarely on the shoulders of the current administration, and the fact that our 'jobs czar' is involved raises questions in itself.

More big government, more waste.


spin it how ever you want....we are not investing in the future like we used to. And that will come back to haunt us.

_________________
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 10:27 am
Posts: 8648
Martin Ent Inc wrote:
SOURCE,,, SOURCE I can't do any research myself, I am a liberal you must provide FREE source.



so far liberals have been providing sources, and you, and many of your conservative pals here have been stonewalling on questions and sources. You learn that tactic from Romney????

_________________
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 6:15 pm
Posts: 5200
Archer I was just joking about the Volts fires, LOL. You keep saying "we're not investing...". Anyone here is free to invest in A123 public stock, or buy an electric car today. I hear a lot of whining and complaining that "we" need to do something. Well have at it. Nobody is preventing you from spending your cash on A123 stock or Chevy Volts. Go for it! :)


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:22 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:06 pm
Posts: 6467
My sources are the same as YOUR favorite VL they are confidential.
And if you want to then provide them, I like to make people learn by doing their own research.

_________________
Remember, When seconds count, a cop is only minutes away.
"You can only have too much ammo if you are on fire or swimming!" ~unknown
Check http://ratraxinc.com


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 10:27 am
Posts: 8648
Martin Ent Inc wrote:
My sources are the same as YOUR favorite VL they are confidential.
And if you want to then provide them, I like to make people learn by doing their own research.


Nice cop out

_________________
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 10:27 am
Posts: 8648
So Martin, is Harry Reid off the hook with you now? He doesn't need to provide his source because people should learn by doing their own research. Cool......I like that!!!!!!

_________________
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:59 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:06 pm
Posts: 6467
Who's Harry Reid?

_________________
Remember, When seconds count, a cop is only minutes away.
"You can only have too much ammo if you are on fire or swimming!" ~unknown
Check http://ratraxinc.com


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A123 to the Chinese
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 10:33 am
Posts: 13524
Location: Jefferson, CO
archer wrote:
so far liberals have been providing sources


:wink: Except for Harry Reid?

_________________
Your American President, Richard Milhouse Obama.


Log in or register to leave comments.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LadyJazzer and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
POWERED_BY