More food for thought. It's not a "Christian vs. Muslim" argument. It's "Islamism vs. the US Constitution".
Pro-Muslim Brotherhood Candidate Eyes Public Office
In the United States, many Islamists are
mistakenly considered moderates because they work to lawfully indoctrinate Islamic ideology "by persuasion" rather than force.
Such "progressive" Islamists denounce the violence of groups like al-Qaeda and the Taliban, but not the ideology behind them.
Islamism is considered dangerous by its critics because it does not hold the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land. Islamists who do not wield a sword or strap on a bomb are more dangerous than violent Islamists because they take advantage of "soft" political language like minority rights rhetoric in secular democracies to turn those principles on their head once in political power. By encroaching in the public sphere with individual innocuous challenges to separation of church and state, Islamists impose their religious beliefs on the rest of society.
http://www.meforum.org/2135/pro-muslim- ... lic-office
Login
E-mail Alerts 
FAQ
Search
